CASE Insights Strategic Benchmarking Report on
Alumni Engagement,
2023

Prepared for Sample Institution

May 2024

THIS SAMPLE REPORT USES SIMULATED DATA FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES

About this Report

Self-Selected Peers

AEM Peers
Sample AEM Peer 1
Sample AEM Peer 2
Sample AEM Peer 3
Sample AEM Peer 4
Sample AEM Peer 5
Sample AEM Peer 6
Sample AEM Peer 7
Sample AEM Peer 8
Sample AEM Peer 9
Sample AEM Peer 10
Sample AEM Peer 11
Sample AEM Peer 12

Report Navigation

If you wish to print this report, please note you may need to adjust your printer settings to achieve the desired layout of the printed document.

The charts in this report are interactive, allowing you to:

  • Zoom in icon Zoom In
  • Zoom out icon Zoom Out
  • Reset icon Reset the axes after zooming in or out
  • Pan icon Pan and move within the chart
  • Download icon Download the chart as a .png file
  • Double click on a legend item to isolate that item. Double click again to show all items
  • Single click on a legend item to hide that item. Single click again to unhide the item
  • Toggle between displaying benchmarking groups, such as Peer Selection Self-Selected Peers or Peer Selection All Respondents charts

Some tables in this report are also interactive, allowing you to:

  • Copy button Copy the table to your clipboard
  • Download the table as a CSV button CSV, Excel button Excel, or PDF button PDF file
  • Print button Print the table. This will open the data in a new tab within your browser
  • Search within the table
  • Sort the table columns ascending or descending by clicking on the column header
  • Show next pages of data for tables with more rows than displayed

About CASE Insights on Alumni Engagement

CASE InsightsSM on Alumni Engagement collects data from institutions globally, and had 376 respondents in its 5th year. The 2023 survey collected data based on the fiscal year. Review the Alumni Engagement Institutional Characterstics table for the reporting cycle per institution. This presentation outlines your institution’s data alongside aggregate data from the overall survey population and your Self-Selected Peers. Data are presented in a standardized format, using data from both the full and minimal versions of the survey.

The CASE global AEM survey enables institutions to measure alumni engagement across four modes: Philanthropic, Volunteerism, Experiential, and Communications. The framework was created by a volunteer task force of alumni relations professionals and defines alumni engagement as activities that are valued by alumni, build enduring and mutually beneficial relationships, inspire loyalty and financial support, strengthen the reputation of the institution and involve alumni in meaningful activities. Access the Guidance Document for specific inclusions and exclusions across the four modes.


Executive Overview

An executive overview will be written by the CASE Insights team with the purchase of presentation calls. If your purchase includes calls, this section will be populated after your preview call with the CASE Insights team.

Institutional Characteristics

Alumni Engagement


Alumni Engagement Overview

CASE Insights on Alumni Engagement enables institutions to measure alumni engagement across four modes: Philanthropic, Volunteerism, Experiential, and Communications. Please see the Alumni Engagement Findings section for definitions of what is counted in each of the four modes according to the CASE Global Reporting Standards.

Legally Contactable Alumni Engaged Any Mode

Summary, 2023

Change

Data


Engagement Segmentation

Summary, 2023

While Percentage Engaged is a helpful measure of alumni affinity, the following views provide benchmarks to understand the engagement (or unengagement) of your legally contactable alumni. The categories below are percentages of legally contactable alumni. Please note, these shares may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Use the Data tab to see more precise values.

Engaged Alumni Who Don't Give
Engaged Alumni Who Give
Unengaged Alumni
Philanthropic Alumni who ONLY Give

Engagement and Giving, 2023

The charts below show the percentage of engaged alumni in each mode who give. The Data tab shows the “Confidence Level” reported by each institution for each mode of engagement.

Engaged through Communication and Give
Engaged Experientially and Give
Volunteer and Give

Data

Click to Expand Data: Summary, 2023
Click to Expand Data: Engaged through Communication and Give
Click to Expand Data: Engaged Experientially and Give
Click to Expand Data: Volunteer and Give


Engagement by Graduation Cohort

Sample Institution

Communication
Experiential
Volunteers
Philanthropy

Peers

The charts below display median data from 6 of your peers which responded to this optional question (Sample AEM Peer 2, Sample AEM Peer 3, Sample AEM Peer 4, Sample AEM Peer 7, Sample AEM Peer 11, Sample AEM Peer 9).

Communication
Experiential
Volunteers
Philanthropy

Data


Distribution of Confidence Level by Mode

Respondents were asked to provide a Confidence Level for Communication, Experiential, and Volunteer modes of engagement. Responses indicate the level of confidence that the data captured are representative of institutional activities and events. The chart below shows an aggregate of your peers’ confidence levels. Select the data tab to see individual institutions’ confidence levels.

Chart

Sample Institution reported Confident for Volunteer data, Somewhat confident for Experiential data, and Somewhat confident for Communication data.

Data


Alumni Engagement Findings

Alumni

Legally Contactable Alumni

Alumni by Category shows a breakdown of seven alumni categories by the percentage and count of legally contactable alumni. If a respondent completed the minimal version of the survey, they will only have Degreed and Non-Degreed/Other categories.

Counts

Percents

Change

Data

Click to Expand Data: Counts
Click to Expand Data: Percents
Click to Expand Data: Change

Definitions

Legally contactable alumni includes anyone who is not marked as deceased, is contactable (via mail, phone, or email) and does not have a total (for all purposes and by all means) no contact status. Because of privacy laws, individuals may specifically need to provide opt-in consent to allow the institution to be in touch with them. In those cases, only individuals who provided such consent would be counted as legally contactable. Each category is based only on degrees to your institution.

  • Secondary/Independent School - Secondary or independent schools should count individuals who received a diploma or secondary certificate or, if the school does not award diplomas or certificates, completed the highest level of education available at the institution. A-Level or International Baccalaureate (B) graduates would also be included in these totals. If the individual received any additional degree or certification in another category from your institution, count him or her in Category 5, “Multiple-Degreed.”
  • Associate/Diploma-Degreed - For higher education institutions, for geographies that award Associate’s Degrees (e.g., Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, and the US, among others) and for geographies that award Diplomas of Higher Education (e.g., the UK, among others) or a Higher National Diploma (e.g., the UK among others): Individuals who hold one or more of these types of qualifications, but no other type of qualification. For independent schools: individuals who received a diploma or, if the school does not award diplomas, completed the highest level of education available at the institution. If the individual received any additional degree or certification in another category, they are included in Category 4, “Multiple Degreed.”
  • Undergraduate Degreed - Individuals who hold one or more undergraduate degrees, but no other type of degree, diploma, or certificate. If the individual received any additional degree or certification in another category, they are included in Category 4, “Multiple Degreed.”
  • Postgraduate Degreed - Individuals who hold one or more graduate degrees (e.g., MBA, PhD, etc.) and/or a higher diploma, but no other type of degree or certificate.If the individual received any additional degree or certification in another category, count them in Category 4, “Multiple Degreed.”
  • Multiple Degreed - Individuals who hold more than one associate’s, diploma, undergraduate, other postgraduate degree, certificate, fellowship, or residency specific to your institution. For independent schools that award diplomas, include individuals who received multiple diplomas by completing both primary and secondary education. Count any individual who meets the criteria of more than one category as Multiple Degreed. Certificate or Award - Individuals who received an award or credential and who are not counted in any of the preceding categories. Included in this category would be those who received a Postgraduate Certificate in Education or other professional certifications.
  • Non-Degreed/Other - Individuals who completed at least one term or one semester or at least one degree-credit course with passing grades, but who are not counted in any of the preceding categories. This category also includes Other individuals, which are honorary graduates (e.g., the only degree from your institution is an honorary one), post-docs, visiting students—such as study abroad students—and any other individual your institution considers an alumnus/a not already counted in another category.


Staffing and Expenditures

Alumni Relations Staff Full Time Equivalent (FTE)

This was an optional survey question.

Chart

Data

Definitions

Alumni Relations staff includes a count of full-time equivalents (FTEs), including both salaried and hourly employees. Staff specifically identified as advancement staff (regardless of where they report) are allocated to alumni relations on a percentage basis, based upon the work they do. For example, someone who is a full-time alumni relations staff person is counted as 1. Alternatively, if someone works in advancement and is split 50/50 between alumni relations and fundraising; that individual is allocated as 0.5 in this calculation, regardless of whether the person actually reports to alumni relations, the central advancement office, president or vice-chancellor, dean, foundation, career services, or association. Individuals who are not considered advancement staff, but who may spend some time on alumni relations (such as a faculty member) are not counted in this total. Temporary staff or volunteers such as student callers, individuals who help with mailings, or those who work at fundraising/alumni events are not included.


Staff FTE by Contactable Alumni

This was an optional survey question. The following graph shows the scatter plot of Contactable Alumni and Alumni Relations Staff FTE. Each dot on the graph represents a single institution with different colors representing your institution, your peers, your region, and All Respondents participants.

The “Average Relationship” regression line quantifies the relationship between Contactable Alumni and Staff FTE for All Respondents Participants institutions. It can be interpreted to be the average number of Alumni Relationship Staff for a given amount of Contactable Alumni. If a dot is above the line, that means the institution has more staff than the survey average for that amount of Contactable Alumni. Dots below the line, suggest the institution has less staff than the survey average for that amount of Contactable Alumni.

Chart

Data


Staff FTE by Alumni Engagement

This was an optional survey question. The following graph shows the scatter plot of Alumni Engaged Any Mode and Alumni Relations Staff FTE. Each dot on the graph represents a single institution with different colors representing your institution, your peers, your region, and All Respondents participants.

The “Average Relationship” regression line quantifies the relationship between Alumni Engaged Any Mode and Staff FTE. It can be interpreted to be the average number of Alumni Relationship Staff for a given amount of Alumni Engaged. If a dot is above the line, that means the institution has more staff than average for that amount of Alumni Engaged. Dots below the line suggest the institution has less staff than average for that amount of Alumni Engaged. Exactly half the institutions will be above the line and half will be below.

Chart

Data


Alumni Relations Expenditures

The median data for All Respondents Participants has been converted to your institution’s local currency.

Chart

Events

NOTE: This was an optional question.

Data

Click to Expand Data: Expenditures
Click to Expand Data: Events

Definitions

The measurement of alumni relations expenditures only include the staff and non-staff direct costs involved in alumni relations activities. Thus, the costs included here are the costs of staff expenditures, and other programming and operational costs that comprise the alumni relations function. These are the actual expenditures incurred for the fiscal year, not the original budget. For the purposes of these expenditure questions, costs exclude the indirect costs associated with alumni relations. For example, exclude academic staff and administrative staff who may sometimes play a role in alumni relations and who are NOT included in the staff FTE calculation, the costs associated with the recruitment of students, or the promotion of the research activities of your institution.


Alumni Engagement

Engagement: ANY Mode

Percentage Engaged by ANY mode is a metric which divides the number legally contactable alumni by the number of alumni who were engaged by at least one of the four modes. Review engagement by each mode for insight into how the 38,506 alumni are engaged with your institution.

Charts

Hover over each institution’s Change in Engaged Alumni to explore changes in engagement by mode.

Data


Engagement: Communication

Sample Institution reported 35,701 alumni (13.9% of legally contactable alumni) engaged through Communication.

Degree Type

Degree Type Change

This chart shows the percentage change of engaged alumni by each degree type. For example, a 10% increase in Undergraduate Alumni may reflect an increase from 100 engaged alumni to 110 engaged alumni. Hover over each Institution to see the change in alumni counts.

Some of your peers’ data may not be included in the chart below due to inconsistencies.

Graduation Cohort

This is an option question, first introduced in the 2023 reporting cycle. This graph is most useful when categories in the graph are viewed in isolation or in smaller groups. To isolate a single category, double click on the legend for the category you are interested in viewing. To look at a smaller group of categories, click once on the legend for each category you want to remove.

Data

Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Counts
Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Percents
Click to Expand Data: Change by Degree Type
Click to Expand Data: Graduation Cohort

Definitions

Communication Engagement, for purposes of the AEM survey is defined as “interactive, meaningful and informative communication that supports the institution’s mission, strategic goals and reputation.” Specifically included in this count would be individuals who participated in any of the following activities as examples:

  • Subscribing to a digital group/forum (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, closed communities). Please note that this does not include alumni who simply belong to a digital group/forum but only the alumni who joined during the fiscal year.
  • Registering, but not attending, an event.
  • Downloading a podcast produced by your institution.
  • Clicking through on an email link.
  • Submitted class notes (regardless of whether they are submitted via postal mail or digitally)
  • Submitted a form with, or some other provision of, data updates, such as address or employment information
  • Responded to an alumni survey, such as for Net Promotor Score, or one that is attitudinal or demographic
  • Submitted an event evaluation form
  • Wrote one or more letters to the editor of alumni magazines, newsletters, and the like
  • Email responses, direct messages, social media direct messages, or phone contact that are meaningful
  • Responded to a call for nominations, awards, and the like
  • Made likes or comments on owned digital content (e.g., content originally posted by the institution)
  • Made likes or comments on original digital content (e.g., content originally posted by someone outside the institution)
  • Posted to digital groups/forums (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube channels, closed communities), regardless of whether such content is positive or negative
  • Re-Tweeted “owned” content (e.g., content originally posted by the institution)
  • Tweeted or re-Tweeted original tweets in which the institution is mentioned or referenced, regardless of whether such content is positive or negative
  • Posted original other social media content and/or reposted original other social media content in which the institution is mentioned or referenced, regardless of whether such content is positive or negative


Engagement: Experiential

Sample Institution reported 3,571 alumni (1.4% of legally contactable alumni) engaged Experientially.

Degree Type

This graph is most useful when categories in the graph are viewed in isolation or in smaller groups. To isolate a single category, double click on the legend for the category you are interested in viewing. To look at a smaller group of categories, click once on the legend for each category you want to remove. Some of your peers’ data may not be included in the chart below due to inconsistencies.

Degree Type Change

This chart shows the percentage change of engaged alumni by each degree type. For example, a 10% increase in Undergraduate Alumni may reflect an increase from 100 engaged alumni to 110 engaged alumni. Hover over each Institution to see the change in alumni counts.

Some of your peers’ data may not be included in the chart below due to inconsistencies.

Graduation Cohort

This is an option question, first introduced in the 2023 reporting cycle. This graph is most useful when categories in the graph are viewed in isolation or in smaller groups. To isolate a single category, double click on the legend for the category you are interested in viewing. To look at a smaller group of categories, click once on the legend for each category you want to remove.

Event Attendees

The AEM survey asked respondents to provide counts of alumni who attended at least one in-person event, at least one virtual event, or both during FY2023. This chart shows the percentage of contactable alumni who fit into the three categories. NOTE: This was an optional question.

Data

Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Counts
Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Percents
Click to Expand Data: Change by Degree Type
Click to Expand Data: Graduation Cohort
Click to Expand Data: Event Attendees

Definitions

Experiential engagement, for purposes of the AEM survey is defined as “meaningful experiences that inspire alumni, are valued by the institution, promote its mission, celebrate its achievements and strengthen its reputation.” Specifically included in this count would be individuals who participated in any of the following activities as examples:

  • Attendees of Fee-based or Free Events - includes homecoming, reunion, campus-based events, regional/club/chapter/affinity-group events, community-focused events, lecture series (whether in-person or virtual), career services programming (whether in-person or virtual), alumni travel programs, athletics/sports-related events (see guidance below for attending athletic contests), donor recognition/stewardship events, campaign-related events (such as kickoffs or celebrations)
  • Virtual Communities of the type that might be considered alumni benefits - These would include career communities, affinity group communities, book clubs, or similar. Do not include any LinkedIn or Facebook groups with non-specific/generic content
  • Season Ticket Holders - such as for athletics/sport or cultural programming. Do not count individuals who had partial-season tickets or single-event tickets
  • Dues-Paying Alumni Association Memberships - for which an individual must pay dues to a centrally managed alumni association in order to be a member. Do not count if all alumni are automatically considered members without making a dues payment. If you answered Yes to the Inputs question about having a dues-paying Alumni Association, you should count members in this Mode. Life members should be included. If there is a joint and/or family membership, count each of the included individuals who are alumni. If the membership transaction is only considered a philanthropic contribution to the institution, count the individual in philanthropic engagement, not here.
  • Meaningful, Substantive Contact - includes those alumni who have participated in meaningful or substantive calls or in-person meetings for which a contact report has been captured and recorded. Count all purposes of contact, including cultivation, solicitation, or stewardship


Engagement: Volunteers

Sample Institution reported 2,509 alumni (1.0% of legally contactable alumni) engaged as Volunteers.

Degree Type

Degree Type Change

This chart shows the percentage change of engaged alumni by each degree type. For example, a 10% increase in Undergraduate Alumni may reflect an increase from 100 engaged alumni to 110 engaged alumni. Hover over each Institution to see the change in alumni counts.

Some of your peers’ data may not be included in the chart below due to inconsistencies.

Graduation Cohort

This is an option question, first introduced in the 2023 reporting cycle. This graph is most useful when categories in the graph are viewed in isolation or in smaller groups. To isolate a single category, double click on the legend for the category you are interested in viewing. To look at a smaller group of categories, click once on the legend for each category you want to remove.

Data

Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Counts
Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Percents
Click to Expand Data: Change by Degree Type
Click to Expand Data: Graduation Cohort

Definitions

Volunteer engagement, for purposes of the AEM survey is defined as “formally defined and rewarding volunteer roles that are endorsed by and valued by the institution”.

Specifically included in this count would be individuals who participated in any of the following activities as examples:

  • governing or advisory board members
  • volunteer fundraisers, such as class agents/gift officers, major gift solicitation volunteers, online ambassadors
  • officers (e.g., chair, deputy chair, treasurer, secretary) in a group that is endorsed by the institution
  • activity/event host or organizer
  • student recruitment activities
  • career mentors
  • public advocates
  • classroom and/or commencement speakers (that are unpaid)
  • interviewed for an alumni profile, regardless of whether that profile ultimately was published
  • social media (blog, Instagram, Twitter, etc.) ‘take-over’ volunteers
  • other volunteer roles that meet the white paper definition: Formally defined and rewarding volunteer roles that are endorsed and valued by the institution and support its mission and strategic goals.


Engagement: Philanthropic

Sample Institution reported 2,574 alumni (1.0% of legally contactable alumni) engaged philanthropically.

Degree Type

Degree Type Change

This chart shows the percentage change of engaged alumni by each degree type. For example, a 10% increase in Undergraduate Alumni may reflect an increase from 100 engaged alumni to 110 engaged alumni. Hover over each Institution to see the change in alumni counts.

Some of your peers’ data may not be included in the chart below due to inconsistencies.

Graduation Cohort

This is an option question, first introduced in the 2023 reporting cycle. This graph is most useful when categories in the graph are viewed in isolation or in smaller groups. To isolate a single category, double click on the legend for the category you are interested in viewing. To look at a smaller group of categories, click once on the legend for each category you want to remove.

Data

Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Counts
Click to Expand Data: Degree Type Percents
Click to Expand Data: Change by Degree Type
Click to Expand Data: Graduation Cohort

Definitions

Philanthropic Engagement is defined as financial support that is meaningful to the donor and supports the institution’s mission and strategic goals. Alumni who are philanthropically engaged are individuals who received either a legal credit, hard credit, direct contribution credit, soft credit, or recognition credit, inclusive of outright gifts and pledge payments within the fiscal year. This also includes gifts of life insurance or premiums paid to support those, when the institution is the owner and beneficiary of the plan; the tax deduction allowed for newly established charitable remainder trusts, charitable gift annuities, and pooled-income funds. Also count gifts from IRAs.


Engagement Across Multiple Modes

To keep the data comparable, only institutions that provided data on alumni that participated in all four modes for all years between 2021 and 2023 were included in this section. The resulting sample sizes are 8 Peers (Sample AEM Peer 2, Sample AEM Peer 3, Sample AEM Peer 4, Sample AEM Peer 6, Sample AEM Peer 7, Sample AEM Peer 1, Sample AEM Peer 8, Sample AEM Peer 9), 100 Sample Country/Region institutions, and 136 All Respondents.

All Engagement

Engagement Excluding Philanthropy

Data

Click to Expand Data: All Engagement
Click to Expand Data: Engagement Excluding Philanthropy