THIS SAMPLE REPORT USES SIMULATED DATA FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES
CCAE Peers |
---|
Sample CCAE Peer 1 |
Sample CCAE Peer 2 |
Sample CCAE Peer 3 |
Sample CCAE Peer 4 |
Sample CCAE Peer 5 |
Sample CCAE Peer 6 |
Sample CCAE Peer 7 |
Sample CCAE Peer 8 |
Sample CCAE Peer 9 |
Sample CCAE Peer 10 |
The CASE Insights on Philanthropy (Canada) (formerly the CASE-CCAE
Support of Education Survey, Canada) is conducted in partnership with CCAE (The Canadian Council
for the Advancement of Education) and is the authoritative source of
data on giving to Canadian colleges, institutes, and universities. The
survey collects data on funds received and committed, donor populations
and gift bands, charitable purposes, and staffing. The survey:
*
Provides an industry standard model for measuring and reporting
fundraising outcomes.
* Provides participants with standardized
data to benchmark year-over-year fundraising progress, make reliable
apples-to-apples comparisons with peer institutions, and inform
fundraising strategy.
* Helps institutional leaders set goals,
assess performance, build capacity, and make informed, strategic
decisions regarding investments in advancement.
* Raises the
profile of higher education advancement in Canada and increase public
understanding of the role of philanthropy in supporting Canadian
students and institutions.
* Provides data to help measure the
impact of public policy and inform advocacy initiatives supporting
educational advancement in Canada and globally.
In its 6th year,
the 2023 survey collected data from 42 Canadian colleges, institutes,
and universities.
The data in this report is provided to Sample Institution for
internal benchmarking and to inform strategic decision making. Data from
charts and downloadable source data should not be published or disclosed
to individuals or organizations outside of Sample Institution . Data
included here should be handled in compliance with the CASE-CCAE Survey
Data Sharing Agreement signed as part of the survey
process.
Background
The Canadian Council
for the Advancement of Education (CCAE) has partnered with CASE on the
CASE-CCAE Survey and agrees to the terms of use of the CASE database as
described below.Agreement between the Council for Advancement and
Support of Education (“CASE”) and the Institution indicated below (the
“Institution”) individually a Party and together the Parties. The
Parties hereby agree in consideration for the rights granted by CASE to
the Institution and the rights granted by the Institution to
CASE:
1. Definitions
The following
definitions apply in this agreement:
Data means the data
comprising the questionnaire responses provided by the Institution to
CASE in respect of the 2022 CASE-CCAE Survey of Charitable Giving to
Higher Education in Canada;
Database means that database of data
comprising disaggregated questionnaire responses and information
provided by Sharing Institutions and the data and information contained
therein;
Survey means the CASE-CCAE of Charitable Giving to
Higher Education in Canada conducted by CASE in partnership with CCAE
(“Canadian Council for Advancement of Education”);
Survey
Collaborators means CASE, CCAE, and such other organizations as is
approved by CASE subject always to the confidentiality provisions set
out in clause 3;
Tool means the online reporting tool accessible
at the website address notified by CASE to the Institution providing
access to the Database;
Sharing Institution means an institution
that has agreed to the terms contained in this
Agreement.
2. Rights
2.1 CASE hereby
grants the Institution a right to access the Tool and use the
information contained in the Database solely for the Institution’s
internal benchmarking or performance for the term of this Agreement,
subject always to Clause 3.
2.2 The Institution hereby grants
CASE and CCAE:
2.2.1 a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty free,
worldwide license to use the Data for the purposes of the Survey subject
to the terms of this Agreement; and
2.2.2 a non-exclusive,
perpetual, royalty free, worldwide license to sub-licensee the Data to
the Survey Collaborators for the purposes of the Survey;
and
2.2.3 a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty free, worldwide
license to sub-licensee the Data to other Sharing Institutions for the
purposes of internal benchmarking of performance.
3.
Confidentiality
3.1 The Institution shall:
(a)
keep confidential the Database and/or information obtained from the
Tool;
(b) not disclose to third parties, without the express
prior written consent of CASE, the Database and/or information obtained
from the Tool;
(c) ensure that no publication of Database and/or
information obtained from the Tool occurs without the prior express
written consent of CASE; and
(d) disclose the Database and/or
information obtained from the Tool which is provided by CASE to the
Institution for internal benchmarking or performance, only to those
persons necessary for the purposes of such internal benchmarking and
only to the extent necessary for the proper performance of their
duties.
3.2 The Institution shall ensure that the obligations in
clause 3.1 are observed by its employees, students, officers and agents
and by any other party retained by the Institution and any other party
who engages in the internal benchmarking or performance at the
instigation of the Institution.
3.3 The Institution shall notify
CASE immediately if it becomes aware of any disclosure in breach of the
obligations in this clause 3. At the request of CASE, the Institution
will take all such steps as are necessary to prevent further
disclosure.
3.4 The provisions of this clause 3 shall not apply
to:
(a) any information which is in the public domain at the date
of this agreement or which subsequently comes into the public domain
other than by breach of this agreement or any other confidentiality
agreement; or
(b) any information already in the possession of
the Institution at the date of this agreement, other than under an
obligation of confidentiality; or
(c) any information obtained
without any obligation of confidence from a third party that is not in
breach of a confidentiality agreement with the Company concerning the
information obtained;
(d) the extent information is required to
be disclosed by law, by any governmental or other regulatory authority
or by a court or other authority of competent jurisdiction provided
that, to the extent it is legally permitted to do so, it gives the other
party as much notice of such disclosure as possible and, where notice of
disclosure is not prohibited, it takes into account the reasonable
requests of the other party in relation to the content of such
disclosure.
3.5 On termination of this Agreement, the Institution
shall erase all Database and/or information obtained from the Tool from
computer and communications systems and devices used by it, including
such systems and data storage services provided by third parties (to the
extent technically practicable).
3.6 CASE gives no warranty of
any kind in respect of the Tool or the Database and all statutory and
implied warranties, terms and conditions are excluded to the full extent
allowed by law.
3.7 The provisions of this clause 3 shall be
deemed effective from the time of signing of this agreement and shall
remain in full force and effect thereafter.
4. Duration
and Termination
4.1 This Agreement shall come into force
on the date of signature below and shall remain in force until the
earlier of:
(a) three months after CASE has served a notice to
the Institution; or
(b) the date of any breach by the Institution
of the terms of this Agreement; or
(c) 14 days after the date of
any notice of breach of this Agreement by CASE as notified by the
Institution.
An executive overview will be written by the CASE Insights team with the purchase of presentation calls. If your purchase includes calls, this section will be populated after your preview call with the CASE Insights team.
New Funds Committed provides a comprehensive measure of the impact and effectiveness of fund-raising efforts in a given year, capturing the value of new cash gifts, gifts of securities, gifts of real property, and other gifts in-kind as well as the total value of new gift commitments and pledges committed for up to five years duration. The measure excludes some philanthropic income received in the reporting year, notably payments on pledges committed in prior years.
This graph examines Percentage Change, which was calculated by setting the first year of CCAE participation since 2019 as the baseline. If your institution first submitted data in any year after 2019, that will be the base year. The Peer Median is calculated using only institutions which participated in the CASE-CCAE survey in all of the last three years.
Funds received in a year includes all cash which arrives during the year including new single cash gifts, cash payments received against pledges committed in this or previous years and cash from legacies. It reflects philanthropic revenue from fundraising conducted in the reporting year as well as income from gift commitments from prior years.
This graph examines Percentage Change, which was calculated by setting the first year of CCAE participation since 2019 as the baseline. If your institution first submitted data in any year after 2019, that will be the base year.
New Funds Committed (NFC) are new monies and property committed in the reporting year from any individual or qualified organization. This includes new outright gifts, new documented pledges for up to 5 years, new irrevocable planned gifts received or committed, and new qualified and documented bequests / legacy intentions if the donor is age 65 or older.
Outright gifts include:
New Funds Committed excludes cash received in-year from pledges. Bequest commitments are not counted in funds committed, due to the level of uncertainty as to when the funds may be received.
Sample Institution reported $35,403,599 New Funds Committed in 2023. This was more than the median of your self selected peers ($18,135,911) and more than the median of your reporting group ($14,317,086).
Sample Institution had 6% change in New Funds Committed between 2022 and 2023. For comparison, your Peers had a median change of 9% and your reporting group had a median change of -6%. Change in New Funds Committed from 2022 to 2023 was calculated as the difference in 2023 NFC and 2022 NFC, divided by 2022 NFC. A positive number indicates that New Funds Committed increased during the period while a negative number indicates that New Funds Committed decreased.
New Funds Committed was divided by student full time equivalent (FTE) for the 2023 data. This serves to normalize the impact of institution size on funds committed, which provides a more equitable comparison.
This was an optional survey question.
This chart shows the change in new funds committed for each gift band between 2022 and 2023. Gift bands with positive percentages reflect where new funds committed increased from 2022 to 2023 and gift bands with negative percentages reflect where new funds committed decreased.
This was an optional survey question.
Note: The sums of new funds committed from each source for comparison groups may not match the total new funds committed in previous charts due to calculations.
This was an optional survey question.
Note: The sums of new funds committed for each purpose for comparison groups may not match the total new funds committed in previous charts due to calculations.
Funds Received are monies and property received within the reporting year from any individual or qualified organization. This includes outright gifts, payments received to fulfill pledges made in the current or previous years, irrevocable planned gifts at face value, and realized bequests/legacy intentions. It reflects philanthropic revenue from fundraising conducted in the reporting year as well as income from gift commitments from prior years.
Sample Institution reported $30,795,052 Funds Received in 2023. This was more than the median of your self selected peers ($21,279,464) and more than the median of your reporting group ($13,827,160).
Sample Institution had -12% change in Funds Received between 2022 and 2023. For comparison, your Peers had a median change of 8% and your reporting group had a median change of 7%. Change in Funds Received from 2022 to 2023 was calculated as the difference in 2023 FR and 2022 FR, divided by 2022 FR A positive number indicates that Funds Received increased during the period while a negative number indicates that Funds Received decreased.
Funds Received was divided by student full time equivalent (FTE) for the 2023 data. This serves to normalize the impact of institution size on funds committed, which provides a more equitable comparison.
This was an optional survey question.
This chart shows the change in funds received for each gift band between 2022 and 2023. Gift bands with positive percentages reflect where funds received increased from 2022 to 2023 and gift bands with negative percentages reflect where funds received decreased.
Bequest intentions for 2022-2023 are reported from donors age 65 or older during the fiscal year (CASE Global Reporting Standards 4.1). Prior to Fiscal Year 2021-2022, bequests did not have an age minimum.
Contactable alumni are living alumni for whom you have a current postal address, email address, or phone number anywhere in the world and whom you are not prohibited from contacting. Sample Institution reported 237,688 contactable alumni in 2023. This was more than the median of your self selected peers (231,446) and more than the median of your reporting group (143,863).
Sample Institution reported 2.0% of contactable alumni in 2023 were donors. This was more than the median of your self selected peers (1.0%) and more than the median of your reporting group (1.5%).
This was an optional survey question.
This was an optional survey question.
This was an optional survey question.
This was an optional survey question.
These graphs further breakdown the giving data by showing the donors by Source over each of the Giving Bands. This view of the data displays how much each source contributes to each giving band.
In 2023, Sample Institution reported 127 total staff FTEs. This was below the 72 staff FTE median of your peers. For fundraising staff, Sample Institution’s 61 staff was above your peers’ 28 median fundraising staff FTEs.
Staff are allocated to either fundraising or alumni relations, depending on which area comprises the majority of their role. Those with equally split roles were attributed 50:50 between the two categories.
Fundraising/Development staff whose duties include:
Alumni Relations staff whose duties include:
Advancement Management staff whose duties include:
Note: support staff who work exclusively for a functional area would be counted within each appropriate category instead of Advancement Management.
Advancement Services staff whose duties include:
Communications/Marketing (directly supporting Alumni Relations and Fundraising) includes staff whose duties include: