THIS SAMPLE REPORT USES SIMULATED DATA FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES
UKI Peers |
---|
Sample UKI Peer 1 |
Sample UKI Peer 2 |
Sample UKI Peer 3 |
Sample UKI Peer 4 |
Sample UKI Peer 5 |
Sample UKI Peer 6 |
Sample UKI Peer 7 |
Sample UKI Peer 8 |
Sample UKI Peer 9 |
Sample UKI Peer 10 |
The first CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey was
carried out in 2002 (for 2001-02 data) and built on previous surveys
undertaken within the Ross Group; the survey has been repeated annually
since then. Participation is open to all higher education institutions
in United Kingdom and Ireland.
The survey collects detailed
information about gift revenue, fundraising costs, and donors to measure
the philanthropic performance of higher education institutions in the
United Kingdom and Ireland. It provides an estimate of the overall
impact of philanthropy on the higher education sector, is the only
source of information on this subject in the United Kingdom and enables
institutions to compare themselves with similar/peer
institutions.
The survey asks for data on specific fundraising
variables: fundraising and alumni relations programme (fundraising and
alumni relations – staff, expenditure), funds received (total, by
source, by contribution level, from legacies, largest cash gifts, from
various triggers), donors (donor intentions, potential donors – total,
individual, organisation, donor numbers – total, individual,
organisations), institutional campaigns, and new funds committed (total,
by source, by contribution level, largest confirmed new pledge or
gift).
Data Sharing Agreement: CASE-Ross Support of Education Survey, UK and
Ireland, 2022 - 23 Between Council for Advancement and Support of
Education (‘CASE’), and the Institution indicated below (the
‘Institution’) individually a Party and together the Parties. The
Parties hereby agree in consideration for the rights granted by CASE to
the Institution and the rights granted by the Institution to
CASE:
1. DEFINITIONS
The following
definitions apply in this agreement. Data means the data comprising the
questionnaire responses provided by the Institution to CASE in respect
of the CASE-Ross Support of Education Survey, UK and
Ireland;
Database means that database of data comprising
disaggregated questionnaire responses and information provided by
Sharing Institutions and the data and information contained therein
since 2006;
Survey means CASE-Ross Support of Education Survey,
UK and Ireland 2023 (survey data year 2021-2022) (previously called
Ross-CASE Survey) conducted by CASE;
Survey Collaborators means
CASE, the CASE-Ross Editorial Board, and such other organisations as is
approved by CASE subject always to the confidentiality provisions set
out in clause 3;
Tool means the online reporting tool accessible
at the website address notified by CASE to the Institution providing
access to the Database;
Sharing Institution means an institution
that has agreed to the terms contained in this
Agreement.
2. RIGHTS
2.1 CASE hereby grants
the Institution a right to access the Tool and use the information
contained in the Database solely for the Institution’s internal
benchmarking or performance for the term of this Agreement, subject
always to Clause 3.
2.2 The Institution hereby grants CASE:
2.2.1 a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty free, worldwide licence to use
the Data for the purposes of the Survey subject to the terms of this
Agreement; and
2.2.2 a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty free,
worldwide licence to sub-licence the Data to the Survey Collaborators
for the purposes of the Survey; and
2.2.3 a non-exclusive,
perpetual, royalty free, worldwide licence to sub-licence the Data to
other Sharing Institutions for the purposes of internal benchmarking of
performance.
3. CONFIDENTIALITY
3.1 The
Institution shall:
(a) keep confidential the Database and/or
information obtained from the Tool;
(b) not disclose to third
parties, without the express prior written consent of CASE, the Database
and/or information obtained from the Tool;
(c) ensure that no
publication of Database and/or information obtained from the Tool occurs
without the prior express written consent of CASE; and
(d) disclose
the Database and/or information obtained from the Tool which is provided
by CASE to the Institution for internal benchmarking or performance,
only to those persons necessary for the purposes of such internal
benchmarking and only to the extent necessary for the proper performance
of their duties.
3.2 Information about each Sharing Institution’s
cluster will be shared with all Sharing Institutions by CASE. This
information will be included in the Database and the Tool.
3.3
The Institution shall procure that the obligations in clause 3.1 are
observed by its employees, students, officers and agents and by any
other party retained by the Institution and any other party who engages
in the internal benchmarking or performance at the instigation of the
Institution.
3.4 The Institution shall notify CASE immediately if
it becomes aware of any disclosure in breach of the obligations in this
clause 3. At the request of CASE, the Institution will take all such
steps as are necessary to prevent further disclosure.
3.5 The
provisions of this clause 3 shall not apply to:
(a) any information
which is in the public domain at the date of this agreement or which
subsequently comes into the public domain other than by breach of this
agreement or any other confidentiality agreement; or
(b) any
information already in the possession of the Institution at the date of
this agreement, other than under an obligation of confidentiality;
or
(c) any information obtained without any obligation of confidence
from a third party that is not in breach of a confidentiality agreement
with the Company concerning the information obtained.
(d) the extent
information is required to be disclosed by law, by any governmental or
other regulatory authority or by a court or other authority of competent
jurisdiction provided that, to the extent it is legally permitted to do
so, it gives the other party as much notice of such disclosure as
possible and, where notice of disclosure is not prohibited, it takes
into account the reasonable requests of the other party in relation to
the content of such disclosure.
3.6 On termination of this
Agreement, the Institution shall erase all Database and/or information
obtained from the Tool from computer and communications systems and
devices used by it, including such systems and data storage services
provided by third parties (to the extent technically
practicable).
3.7 CASE gives no warranty of any kind in respect
of the Tool or the Database and all statutory and implied warranties,
terms and conditions are excluded to the full extent allowed by
law.
3.8 The provisions of this clause 3 shall be deemed
effective from the 30th September in the calendar year of signature
shall remain in full force and effect thereafter.
4.
DURATION AND TERMINATION
4.1 This agreement shall come into
force on the date of the signature below and shall remain in force until
the earlier of:
(a) three months after CASE has served a notice to
the Institution; or
(b) the date of any breach by the Institution of
the terms of this Agreement; or
(c) 14 days after the date of any
notice of breach of this Agreement by CASE or the Survey Collaborators
as notified by the Institution.
5. Contracts (Rights of
Third Parties) Act 1999
The Parties agree that any Sharing
Institution has the right to enforce the terms of this letter against
the Parties should they disclose the Database in breach of the terms of
this letter.
6. Governing Law
We agree that
the terms of the letter will be governed by English law.
An executive overview will be written by the CASE Insights team with the purchase of presentation calls. If your purchase includes calls, this section will be populated after your preview call with the CASE Insights team.
This chart examines Percentage Change in New Funds Committed (NFC), which was calculated by setting setting 2021 as the baseline for your institution and your self-selected peers. This chart is useful to examine your rate of growth in New Funds Committed during the period. Hover over each line to see further information on the New Funds Committed for each year. Please also see the Ranking tab to see how your institution ranked against peers in terms of New Funds Committed each year.
Hover over each line to find more information on the amount of New Funds Committed that institution raised during the given year.
This chart examines Percentage Change in Funds Received (FR), which was calculated by setting setting 2021 as the baseline for your institution and your self-selected peers. This chart is useful to examine your rate of growth in Funds Received during the period. Hover over each line to see further information on the Funds Received for each year. Please also see the Ranking tab to see how your institution ranked against peers in terms of Funds Received each year.
Hover over each line to find more information on the amount of Funds Received that institution received during the given year.
This chart shows Funds Received minus your three largest gifts, which is useful to understand how Funds Received changed excluding large gift outliers.
This chart examines Percentage Change in Total Donors, which was calculated by setting setting 2021 as the baseline for your institution and your self-selected peers. This chart is useful to examine your rate of growth in donors during the period. Hover over each line to see further information on the Total Donors for each year.
Sample Institution reported £30,547,351 New Funds Committed in 2023. This was more than the median of your self-selected peers (£7.6M) and more than the median of your cluster (£8.2M).
Sample Institution had 330% change in New Funds Committed between 2022 and 2023. For comparison, your self-selected peers had a median change of -13% and your cluster had a median change of -2%. Change in New Funds Committed from 2022 to 2023 was calculated as the difference in 2023 NFC and 2022 NFC, divided by 2022 NFC. A positive number indicates that New Funds Committed increased during the period while a negative number indicates that New Funds Committed decreased.
NOTE: Totals for Sources of New Funds Committed may not match Total New Funds Committed if breakouts were not sufficiently provided.
These charts show Sample Institution’s change in Sources of New Funds Committed over time as well as the median trends for your self-selected peers, survey cluster, and all respondents. Select the Details tab to observe the breakouts for each of your self-selected peers in 2023.
This was a new question in the 2022-23 survey.
Sample Institution reported £10,866,031 Funds Received in 2023. This was more than the median of your self-selected peers (£7.8M) and more than the median of your cluster (£8.1M).
Sample Institution had 9% change in Funds Received between 2022 and 2023. For comparison, your self-selected peers had a median change of 0% and your cluster had a median change of 4%. Change in Funds Received from 2022 to 2023 was calculated as the difference in 2023 FR and 2022 FR, divided by 2022 FR A positive number indicates that Funds Received increased during the period while a negative number indicates that Funds Received decreased.
These charts show Sample Institution’s change in Sources of Funds Received over time as well as the median trends for your self-selected peers, survey cluster, and all respondents. Select the Details tab to observe the breakouts for each of your self-selected peers in 2023.
This was a new question in the 2022-23 survey.
These charts show Sample Institution’s change in Funds Received by Trigger over time as well as the median trends for your self-selected peers, survey cluster, and all respondents. Select the Details tab to observe the breakouts for each of your self-selected peers in 2023.
Gift triggers are the interaction or event that caused an individual to decide to donate. The event that triggered the gift may have taken place in previous years.
These charts show Sample Institution’s change in Donor Populations
over time as well as the median trends for your self-selected peers,
survey cluster, and all respondents. Select the Details tab to
observe the breakouts for each of your self-selected peers in 2023.
In 2023, Sample Institution received 98.3% of your total gifts
from individuals (Alumni and Non-Alumni). This was higher than your
self-selected peers, which received a median of 94.8% total gifts from
individuals.
Please note that these gift band categories differ from those in the previous charts.
Contactable alumni are living alumni for whom you have a current
postal address, email address, or phone number anywhere in the world and
whom you are not prohibited from contacting. Sample Institution reported
64,896 contactable alumni in 2023. This was more than the median of
your self selected peers (180,098) and more than the median of
your survey cluster (132,876).
Sample Institution reported
3.9% of contactable alumni in 2023 were donors. This was more than
the median of your self selected peers (0.5%) and more than the
median of your survey cluster (1.1%).
This was an optional survey question.
Development Services was reintroduced to the survey in the 2022-23
reporting cycle.
To better understand trends over time, use
the chart legend to remove the Development Services categories from the
charts.
These charts show Sample Institution’s change in Costs over time as well as the median trends for your self-selected peers, survey cluster, and all respondents. Select the Details tab to observe the breakouts for each of your self-selected peers in 2023.
Your Total Costs per 1,000 Contactable Alumni grew by 16.6% (£7,870) between 2022 and 2023. This change was greater than your self-selected peer’s median change during the same period of 0.3%.
Your New Funds Committed per Fundraising Staff FTE grew by 424.0% (£1,144,353) between 2022 and 2023. This change was greater than your self-selected peer’s median change during the same period of -3.3%.