Alumni engagement metrics have come a long way in a short time and are proving to be crucial to advancement teams. With years of solid data under their belts, many in alumni relations are finding significant results from building systems around these metrics, altering their actions in response, and displaying the value of their work to constituents, institutional leadership, and board members.

The CASE Library has compiled this collection of resources to assist members who are implementing gift fees.

Endowments are permanent funds from charitable gifts that offer colleges and universities the enduring stability to empower generations of students and shape our world's future. 

The CASE Library has developed this resource collection in response to questions on aspects of endowment management. It features articles and other resources on managing and communicating about endowments, as well as reports and white papers on endowments trends and data.

Endowments are permanent funds from charitable gifts that offer schools the enduring stability to empower generations of students and shape our world's future. 

Listing of advancement companies, consultants, and software.

Community and support amid COVID-19, inside the Elizabethtown College carrot cake tradition, exploring the University of Denver's Crimson & Gold Trail, and more.

When a university or college undergoes a name change or merger, becomes widely known for a new program, or has a changing student population, what steps do advancement shops take to communicate these changes to their constituents and pursue the advantages of the situation?

Nearly 125 colleges in the U.S. exhibit four or more of the risk factors, putting them in danger of closing. And there are several challenges on the horizon that put more private colleges at greater risk than ever before. Advancement professionals at these institutions are in the best position to drive the actions that could save these institutions.

CASE Stellar Speakers are faculty members who earn average combined scores of 4.5 and above (on a 5-point scale) on their evaluations for a session at the conference listed.