This is the era of the customer. Every experience is designed around our needs: from Netflix queues and Spotify playlists dictating what we consume, Amazon and StitchFix suggestions guiding our purchases, or Carvana, Zillow, and RedFin making buying autos and homes easy, sight unseen.

These businesses deliver tailored experiences to millions of users by capturing data and putting it into action. Advancement must do the same. In order to confront donor decline and build the future major gift pipeline, we must go beyond traditional segmentation like class year or degree. We have to speak to donors’ interests and deliver the same personalized, high-impact experience they see in the rest of their lives.

The University of Iowa is doing this by introducing a new persona-driven approach to communicating with alumni, donors, and friends. By monitoring more than 400 ever-changing data points, including a newly refined machine-learning-driven engagement score, the team has defined new audience segments. Each of these personas reflects how those people interact with the University, its sports teams, or its medical center.

With these personas built and evolving as donors demonstrate new interests or engage with the university, Iowa is delivering custom digital experiences, programming, and appeals that create better experiences for every donor.

In this session, learn how they built their personas and engagement score, early returns as they roll out a new communication strategy, and how this approach fuels giving and prospect discovery. You’ll learn best practices for every shop, regardless of size, as we all seek to create more personal experiences at scale.

AMAtlas, CASE’s resource for data, metrics, and analytics has laid the foundations for a global set of benchmarking data on educational philanthropy, alumni engagement, and educational fundraising campaigns. This session will bring together a panel of advancement visionaries to discuss the ways they are putting CASE data to work in their development and alumni relations programs and explore ways they might leverage the Alumni Engagement Metrics (AEM) and new Core Metrics going forward. The session will also provide quick overviews of AEM and Core Metrics and discuss how institutions are adapting their processes to capture the data needed to put metrics to work.

The ability to measure activity and understand the relationship between that activity and fundraising productivity are critical to the strategic deployment and maximization of fundraising resources. Furthermore, the capability to identify early intervention points for coaching new gift officers and the continued measurement of seasoned gift officer performance are key in ensuring gift officer success. But what should we be measuring? How should we be measuring it? Who should have access to the metrics? Can predictive solutions be deployed to assist in early intervention? And finally, how can these gift officer metrics be used effectively to inform decision making? The University of Texas at Austin has just completed an 18 month exploratory exercise aimed at building a predictive model to better quantify gift officer performance, establish baseline expectations, and identify early intervention points for coaching new gift officers. Multiple algorithms were explored in partnership with graduate students from UT Austin’s School of Information and members of the university development office’s analytics team. This presentation will detail the process undertaken to arrive at a solution, discuss the insights acquired along the way, and walk attendees through the mechanism produced to distribute scores. Considerations for generating equitable metrics based on role, unit assignment, officer type, and the impact of COVID-19 will be discussed along with an exposition of the final results.

In 2019, CASE’s AMAtlas launched a new survey to measure Alumni Engagement Metrics, which aimed to create a broader understanding of alumni affinity beyond purely philanthropic support. Several challenges arose in the first year, including socializing new metrics, creating a truly global survey, framing the data story, and developing compelling visualizations. In the second year, staff and volunteers incorporated lessons learned to make practical improvements to the survey.

In this session, join members of the AMAtlas team as they discuss their perspectives. The presentation includes a high-level overview about how to incorporate new metrics into existing paradigms and manage expectations externally, creating methods for managing an evolving survey, implementing changes based on feedback, and strategies for developing adaptive reporting using R to match changing expectations.

The New York University (NYU) Development and Alumni Relations (UDAR) team and the University of Washington (UW)Advancement Analytics team will take you on a journey and share how they were able to jumpstart unique data analytics initiatives from inception to maturity in less than a year. Their journeys center on aligning technology with leadership visions and goals, while also empowering front-line fundraisers and marketers to uncover opportunities and take action on critical business insights. They will share an approach that helps them accelerate the implementation and deployment of specialized dashboards, improve the endorsement of their colleagues, and secure high adoption by diverse teams and non-data users. They will demonstrate how their approach can help instill a data-driven culture, and share strategies on how to tackle unique challenges presented by digital data and legacy systems while trying to provide flexible self-service analysis tools. They will also showcase UW’s Email Marketing Dashboard that serves over 50 units, three campuses and over 100 marketers and advancement staff, and NYU’s BI portal which contains more than 60 Dashboards and self-service reports that serve more than 300 fundraisers and development associates and staff and more than 20 schools and global camps.

Hear from a panel of your peers as they share how their institutions are using engagement metrics to refine their approach to alumni engagement and fundraising. We’ll cover what data they chose to include in their engagement metrics, how they shared the results with their teams to ensure adoption, and how data can be used for future engagement strategy, while also supporting annual giving and major gift efforts. Leave this session with a plan for analyzing your constituent data so you can take the next step to turn that data into meaningful change for your institution.